Skip to content
Working Conditions

All questions  ยท  Culture

How do we recognise people without a points scheme?

Whether Effort Is Seen

Formal recognition programmes frequently reduce what they intend to increase. What works instead, and the invisible work nobody thanks.

Procedure

Recognition is the cheapest available intervention and the one most often converted into an administrative system that removes its meaning.

Why formal schemes disappoint

They convert a human act into a transaction. A nomination form is not the same as being told.

They reward visibility, which correlates with the kind of work that is easy to see rather than the work that matters most.

They create winners and losers monthly, which produces more disappointment than satisfaction.

They become routine, and a rotating award means nothing within a year.

They let managers outsource the act. The scheme exists, so the conversation does not have to happen.

What works

Specific, prompt, from someone whose opinion matters to the person.

Naming what was done and why it mattered, which requires the manager to have actually noticed.

Peer recognition, frequently more meaningful than downward recognition and less prone to politics.

Acting on someone's suggestion, which is the strongest form and requires no programme.

Public and private both, for different purposes: private is more credible, public confers standing.

Passing recognition upward, so that senior people know who did the work rather than only who presented it.

The invisible work

Systematically under-recognised, and identifying it is most of the value.

Prevention. The person whose work means nothing goes wrong is invisible by definition, while the person who fixes a crisis is celebrated.

Maintenance. Keeping things running attracts no attention until it stops.

Coordination. The person who makes the collaboration work is rarely credited with the outcome.

Emotional labour. Supporting colleagues, absorbing conflict, holding a team together.

Documentation and knowledge sharing, which benefits everyone later and nobody now.

Ask specifically about these, because they will not surface in a nomination process built on visible achievement.

A practical exercise

Ask each manager to name, for every person reporting to them, one specific thing that person did in the last month that mattered.

Managers who cannot answer are not seeing their people's work, which is the finding rather than a failure of the exercise.

Then have them say it, to the person, specifically, within the week.

Repeat quarterly. It costs an hour and addresses a mismatch no budget reaches.

Where recognition cannot compensate

It does not substitute for pay. Recognition offered in place of a raise is heard as exactly that.

It does not substitute for progression where none exists.

It does not survive unfairness. Praise from an organisation people believe treats them inequitably is discounted.

Recognition works as part of a reward picture that is otherwise adequate, and it fails as a compensation for one that is not โ€” which is precisely how it is most often deployed.

The monthly naming exercise

An hour of manager time that addresses a mismatch no budget reaches.

Each manager writes, for every person reporting to them, one specific thing that person did in the last month that mattered.

Specific means naming the thing, not a general quality.

Managers who cannot complete this are not seeing their people's work, which is the finding rather than a failure of the exercise.

Then they say it, to the person, within the week.

Some of it goes upward so senior people know who did the work.

Repeat monthly for a quarter, then judge whether it has become habit.

The exercise frequently surfaces work the manager did not know about, because writing it forces them to look.

Passing credit upward

Senior people frequently know who presented the work and not who did it.

Name the individuals when reporting outcomes upward.

Be specific about their contribution.

Bring them into the room where it is appropriate.

Correct it when credit lands on you for someone else's work, publicly.

This costs a manager nothing and matters enormously, because visibility to senior people is a currency that affects progression, and quietly retaining it is one of the more consequential unfairnesses a manager can commit.